conservativesense.com — As billionaire activist Tom Steyer suddenly climbs into California’s top tier for governor, many voters are asking whether this is a genuine grassroots surge or another case of big money bending democracy.
Story Snapshot
- Tom Steyer now polls in the top three statewide and even edges into second in one late survey, reshaping California’s governor race.[1][2]
- Competing polls disagree on whether Steyer is rising or slipping, underscoring how volatile and fragile his support may be.[1][2][3]
- Steyer’s massive self-funding fuels both his visibility and suspicions that money, not message, is driving his numbers.[1][3]
- The fight over what Steyer’s rise means reflects a deeper breakdown of trust in political elites, polling, and the primary system itself.[4]
Steyer Vaults Into The Top Tier Of A Crowded Governor’s Race
Late May polling shows Tom Steyer firmly in California’s top tier for governor, transforming him from a long-shot billionaire to a plausible finalist in the state’s top-two primary.[1][2] A University of California, Berkeley Institute of Governmental Studies survey found Steyer at 19 percent among likely voters, trailing Xavier Becerra at 25 percent and close to Steve Hilton at 21 percent.[1] A Los Angeles Times account described the three as having “separated themselves” from the rest of the field.[2] That dynamic matters because, in California’s open primary system, only the top two advance to November, regardless of party.[4] For voters who feel the political class is unresponsive, seeing a nontraditional candidate crack the top tier can look like a sign that the old party machines are losing their grip, at least on the surface.[2][4]
A separate Emerson College survey taken around the same time painted an even stronger picture for Steyer, showing him in second place at 22 percent, just behind Becerra at 28 percent and narrowly ahead of Hilton at 21 percent.[1] Television coverage of that poll stressed that with the margin of error, either Steyer or Hilton could realistically claim the second runoff slot, signaling a true three-way contest rather than a token protest campaign.[1] At the same time, a tracking survey commissioned by the California Democratic Party found Steyer lower, at 15 percent, behind both Hilton and Becerra, suggesting that his standing is improving but far from secure.[2] For ordinary Californians watching from home, the dueling numbers reinforce a broader sense that the political game is murky and that elites, pollsters, and campaigns are presenting different realities while working off the same electorate.[1][2][4]
Money, Message, And The Suspicion That Elections Are For Sale
Coverage of Steyer’s rise repeatedly highlights his extraordinary self-funding, which fuels doubts across the spectrum about whether the polling reflects conviction or pure saturation.[1][3] Local television and print reports note that Steyer has poured well over one hundred million dollars of his own fortune into advertising, field operations, and media, prompting one Republican leader to describe him as “very overexposed.”[1][3] Steyer himself has leaned into that exposure, telling one outlet that his campaign is either “tied or ahead” based on internal and public surveys and stressing that his opponents and outside groups are now spending heavily to blunt his momentum.[3] For conservatives already angry about wealthy liberals bankrolling politics, and for liberals furious about corporate influence and “dark money,” Steyer’s spending spree hits the same nerve: a feeling that ordinary voters cannot compete with billionaires who can dominate the airwaves whenever they choose.[1][3]
What remains harder to see in the available data is how much of Steyer’s support comes from his policy platform versus name recognition. The Berkeley and Emerson polls clearly show him attracting a meaningful share of Democrats and no-party-preference voters, often ranking among the top choices outside the Republican base.[1][2] The Los Angeles Times report notes that no-party-preference voters are roughly split among Becerra, Hilton, and Steyer, suggesting he has some reach beyond a narrow activist niche.[2] Yet none of the public polling released so far ties his support directly to specific issues like climate policy, utility regulation, or healthcare costs.[1][2][4] That gap matters to voters on both the right and left who suspect politicians talk about the middle class and working Americans while quietly serving donors, lobbyists, and entrenched bureaucrats behind the scenes.[4]
Volatile Polls And A Deeper Crisis Of Trust In Institutions
Conflicting polls now show Steyer rising, flat, or even slipping slightly, underscoring how fragile late-campaign “surges” can be in a fractured political environment.[1][2][3] The Berkeley survey reported that support for Becerra, Hilton, and Steyer had all grown since March, with Steyer climbing into clear contention after lagging earlier in the year.[2] The Emerson poll put him briefly ahead of Hilton, reinforcing a storyline of momentum that his campaign eagerly amplified.[1] Yet a SurveyUSA poll and the California Democratic Party’s tracking survey found Steyer below those highs, with headlines emphasizing that Becerra and Hilton continued to hold the two most likely paths to November.[2][3][4] For many voters, this back-and-forth only deepens skepticism that pre-election polling is a tool for understanding the public—or instead a weapon used by insiders to shape expectations and steer donors and activists.[4]
CEPP poll | 5/23-5/26 LV
California Governor jungle primary 2026
(Top two vote getters advance)
🟦Xavier Becerra 29%
🟥Steve Hilton 23%
🟦Tom Steyer 18%
🟥Chad Bianco 11%
🟦Katie Porter 8%
🟦Matt Mahan 4%
🟦Antonio Villaraigosa 3%Link to poll: https://t.co/KEJWhxjDoz pic.twitter.com/2AL6zfhheg
— Politics & Poll Tracker 📡 (@PollTracker2024) June 1, 2026
All of this is playing out against a wider backdrop of frustration with both Sacramento and Washington, where many Americans feel government answers to a professional political class and its connected allies more than to citizens.[4] Analysts note that California’s top-two primary system magnifies that tension by encouraging strategic voting, horse-race coverage, and elite maneuvering, with party organizations and interest groups trying to cue voters on who is “viable.”[4] In that context, Steyer’s surge can look to some like a challenge to the establishment and to others like proof that only the ultra-wealthy can break through the noise. Whether his late rise reflects authentic support or the power of money, the fight over his numbers is really a fight over who still owns American democracy: the people who show up to vote, or the permanent political class and the billionaires who can afford to compete in their world.[1][2][4]
Sources:
[1] Web – Controversial California governor candidate Tom Stayer pulls ahead in …
[2] Web – New CA gov poll shows tight race; Democrats Becerra, Steyer could …
[3] Web – Becerra leads governor’s race, with Hilton and Steyer in tight contest …
[4] Web – Tom Steyer | Sonoma County Election Database
© conservativesense.com 2026. All rights reserved.
