Some States Aim To Ban Use of Food Stamps for Soda

Amid rising health concerns, states like West Virginia and Utah are seeking to limit soda purchases with food stamps, promoting healthier choices through the SNAP program.

Quick Takes

Some states are supporting restrictions on purchasing soda with food stamps.
The initiative aims to align SNAP with nutritional objectives.
Critics raise concerns about access and impact on SNAP recipients’ autonomy, while supporters argue taxpayer dollars should be used to push nutritional options.
Legislation is pending in multiple states to restrict junk food purchases.

State Initiatives for Healthier SNAP Choices

Robert F. Kennedy Jr., leading the “Make America Healthy Again” campaign, is urging states to seek waivers blocking soda purchases with SNAP benefits. Governors of West Virginia and Utah are taking steps in this direction. West Virginia’s Governor Patrick Morrisey has submitted a waiver and signed legislation targeting artificial food dyes in schools.

Efforts to promote healthier eating through SNAP have gained momentum with ten states considering similar legislation. USDA Secretary Brooke Rollins has expressed support for these initiatives, recently saying, “I look forward to receiving Governor Morrisey’s SNAP pilot request and will work swiftly to make certain West Virginia is equipped with the technical assistance and expertise to move forward.”

RFK Jr. Issues New Directive After State’s SNAP Move on Soda https://t.co/ydpSyYqeip

— The Charlotte Observer (@theobserver) March 29, 2025

Debate Over Effectiveness and Autonomy

Critics argue these restrictions may not address fundamental issues like access to healthy foods in poorer areas, commonly known as “food deserts.” Some view the initiative as paternalistic, potentially stigmatizing SNAP recipients. Critics also contend that the root of the problem lies in food affordability and accessibility.

Despite criticism, supporters highlight potential health benefits and policy alignment with SNAP’s original objectives—supporting nutritious food choices. “We should not force Utahns to eat certain foods, and we are not doing that, but we should also not use tax funds to subsidize choices that don’t have nutritional value,” said state Rep. Kristen Chevrier during a floor debate on the Utah legislation.

Road Ahead for SNAP Reforms

Governor Morrisey emphasizes the importance of directing taxpayer dollars toward nutritious foods. However, any changes require Congressional approval or waivers from the USDA, processes that have been historically challenging.

As discussions continue, the evolving narrative around SNAP reform reflects broader conversations about improving public health and better aligning government assistance programs with nutritional goals. The outcome of these initiatives will be closely watched by policymakers nationwide.