Judge Rules Against Google in Massive Antitrust Case

Judge Rules Against Google in Massive Antitrust Case

Well, well, well, readers. It seems the tech giant we’ve all come to rely on (and occasionally curse at) for our daily dose of cat videos and conspiracy theories has finally been caught with its hand in the cookie jar. That’s right, folks – Google, the all-seeing eye of the internet, has been slapped with a ruling that could shake Silicon Valley to its core. Let’s dive into what this case is all about.

The Verdict: Google’s Monopoly Unmasked

U.S. District Judge Amit Mehta has ruled that Google violated antitrust laws, officially labeling the company a “monopolist.” This landmark decision marks the first successful major antitrust case against a tech giant in over two decades, harking back to the days when Microsoft was in the hot seat. The implications? They’re as vast as Google’s search index.

Google’s iron grip on the search engine market, controlling a whopping 90% of U.S. searches, has come under legal scrutiny. The case argues that Google has abused its monopoly power through exclusive distribution agreements and default search engine placements. These aren’t just small-time deals we’re talking about – Google reportedly shelled out $20 billion to Apple in 2022 alone for premium app positioning.

The Trial: A Tech Soap Opera Unfolds

The trial, which started last year and was expected to take around three months, featured a cast of Silicon Valley’s finest. We’re talking millions of documents, over 150 depositions, and star witnesses including Google’s CEO Sundar Pichai and Apple’s Eddy Cue. It’s like a tech version of “Law & Order,” but with more algorithms and fewer dramatic courtroom outbursts.

“This lawsuit strikes at the heart of Google’s grip over the internet for millions of American consumers, advertisers, small businesses and entrepreneurs beholden to an unlawful monopolist,” William Barr, former Attorney General, said when the case was first filed way back in 2020.

Judge Amit Mehta was the sole arbiter in this bench trial. The focus was on three key markets: general search services, general search text ads, and search ads. While Mehta had the power to impose sanctions, the judge decided not to, saying they wouldn’t “move the needle on the court’s assessment of Google’s liability.”

What Now?

Google’s woes are still far from over. The company is still facing other legal cases at the moment, including another one from the DOJ that accuses it of monopolizing online advertising technology. In the online search antitrust case, a second trial is expected to determine what damages Google will face. It’s still unclear what those damages may be or exactly how heavily Google will be impacted.

Sources

  1. ‘Google is a monopolist’: Search giant broke antitrust laws in landmark case, judge rules
  2. United States takes on Google in biggest tech monopoly trial of 21st century

More from Around the Web

More information about cases against other Big Tech companies: